# 1 -
Posted on 1/5/2023 1:00:57
Hindsight I would've put all these in one thread, but I didn't come across them at the same time |
|
# 2 -
Posted on 1/5/2023 17:42:07
I don't believe they qualify as platforms, due to being peripherals that can't be used as a standalone. The games that come out for them will get a "VR" play mode tag, and the PSVR/PSVR2 themselves should get entries as Accessories though at some point. Physical hardware like accessories and peripherals are generally a bit lower on the priority list over games, which is likely why PSVR/PSVR/Kinect, etc... don't have dedicated entries yet. |
|
# 3 -
Posted on 1/5/2023 19:10:23
I’m thinking of it more along the lines of other system accessories that are listed in platforms. Nintendo 64DD, Nintendo E-Reader, Sega CD, Sega 32X etc all require the base console with an extra layer to actually play the titles. PSVR-only titles are pretty much the same. |
|
# 4 -
Posted on 1/5/2023 19:53:06
I can see your point of view here and there is merit to it. What trips me up is that with those older accessories/expansions I believe that they all had a fairly cut and dry separate library with unique physical media, whereas many games are vr-hybrids that still play just fine with a base console while others can't be played without the necessary gear at all. As with a lot of game database situations, it's not clear cut and I think boils down ultimately what's easiest to implement or makes the most sense from an organizational point of view, which is my way of saying... as always it's all up to moho_00! lol |
|
# 5 -
Posted on 1/5/2023 22:15:55
I agree that I don't really see PSVR / Kinect as separate "platforms". On the surface, I can see why the comparison would be made with things like 32X, Jaguar CD, and so on, but there are a couple of key differences:
Additionally, there a few other factors that should be considered:
All that being said, I think it's important to always have an open mind for change and just because PSVR isn't a platform today doesn't mean it won't be at some point when there's a paradigm shift in how we handle platforms. Something I've considered in the past is introducing a new field of sorts that could further categorize games, almost like a "sub platform". That would help identify games that support optional peripherals like PSVR, the N64 Expansion Pak, even light guns and so on. Depending on how deep it went, there might need to be multiple sub platforms It would be especially useful for the super generic "Magazine" platform, so each publication could be a sub platform or something. But I digress, this isn't on my radar at all...but it's something I've noodled with
Post Edited on 1/5/2023 22:19:09
|
|
# 6 -
Posted on 1/6/2023 0:04:36
Gotta say I appreciate how thorough and thought out your post is haha The division between sometimes-optional peripheral vs add-on device with an exclusive library does make a lot of sense. Luckily it’s a select few so I can use put PSVR in the edition or something to stand out. I do like the idea of a peripheral field, fwiw. Thanks for talking it out! |